percentags of food budget spent on resturant meals home cooking
liner chart shows fast food vs sitdown resturant
The first circular representation reveals the infomation about averag of food budget spent on resturant meals and home making food, and the linear layout depicts the comparison between fast food meals vs sitdown resturant meals per year, during th year 1970 to 2000. The data is calibrated in percentum. which is clear and coherent represented.
It is lucid, in cyclic layout food expenditure spent on two meals area such as: resturant meals and home cooking. In the year1970, just 10% money incurred on resturant food as well as more than 80% as to resturant, spent on home meals. While after 10 year saw a small variation in demand of resturant food, it was become 15% while budget of home food was decline just 5% as compared to previous year. However, more than half of house made food to spent currency on outdoor food corner, it respectively 65% , 35% in the year 1990. Moreover, in the next ten years revenue spent on both catagories in same proporations, it became 50% .
As for as, the linera layout showed the utilization of fast food vs sitdown resturant regarding number of meals per year. In the year 1970, both were stable in same level it was 20 per year. After next consumptions of junk food had been incline gradually during year by year, respectively 25,51,91per year in the year 1980,1990 and 2000. However, the demand of resturant meal increased in next year but it was less than as compared to junk food, it became around 40 per year in both year 1980 and 1990, and after decade it reached at 50 per year.
In conclude, overall it is clearly seen that maximum incurred money on home cooking in all years. Whereas, number of meals consumed in both fast food and sitdown resturant were getting high over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | kaur randhawa | 61 | view |
- The diagram below show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 85
- some people say that computer games are bad for children by all means. while others believe that these games are contributing to children development. 89
- percentags of food budget spent on resturant meals home cookingliner chart shows fast food vs sitdown resturant 61
- some people believe that a person improve intellectual skills better when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...0. The data is calibrated in percentum. which is clear and coherent represented. It ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile budget of home food was decline just 5% as compared to previous year. However...
^^
Line 2, column 506, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...outdoor food corner, it respectively 65% , 35% in the year 1990. Moreover, in the ...
^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ries in same proporations, it became 50% . As for as, the linera layout showed th...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... compared to junk food, it became around 40 per year in both year 1980 and 1990, ...
^^
Line 4, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...years. Whereas, number of meals consumed in both fast food and sitdown resturant ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, moreover, regarding, so, well, whereas, while, as for, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 304.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71052631579 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50140718225 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503289473684 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2011875915 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392804459961 0.215688989381 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158596741642 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147363868245 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293945878828 0.15604864568 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104443234535 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.