The picture below show the differences in the layout of conference centre between its present and its future plan. Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps illustrates the layout of a conference centre and its proposed to changes for future.
Overall, the number of meeting room will be increased in future building. There will changed the size of the car park, the garden, the hall and the meeting rooms.
Presently, people can enter the reception through a door. There is a cafe next to the reception in east and the toilet are on the other side. The two meeting rooms is planed on west wall of building. However, the hall is on the opposite wall with approximately same dimension as addition of meeting rooms. The garden and the car park amenities also available following to the main center in east direction.
According to future plan, the cafe will be replaced by fitness centre and cafe will be shifted at north side of hall, included with the separate kitchen. The two meeting rooms will be converted in to three. The garden will become double compare to present size, and the size of present car park will be reduced. The car parking will direct connect with main road; as the parking road will be included into the car parking space.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 91
- In many countries people are spending more time in their workplace Why is this Is this a negative or positive development 67
- Technological Advance Computers are replacing more and more jobs describe some positions that may be lost because of computer and discuss at least one problem that may result 73
- Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punish 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'change'.
Suggestion: change
...a conference centre and its proposed to changes for future. Overall, the number of m...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'change'
Suggestion: change
...ncreased in future building. There will changed the size of the car park, the garden, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ze of present car park will be reduced. The car parking will direct connect with ma...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70256410256 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34561434178 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7258403339 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4166666667 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116536711648 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447005713224 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525829760175 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839225281083 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621717880974 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.