The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given diagram highlights the process of the bottle recycling. It is evident that there are three stages to recyle the glass bottle. Waste glass bottles are collected in the first stage while in the end the new bottle have been ready sold.
In the beginning, the wasted glass are gathered to the collecting point before they are distributed via truck. In the next step, machine will wash the bottle with water and high temprature. They will be divided by colours groups and the clean bottle are produced in the glass factory which demolish all of them in order to be glass pieces.
Following to the next step is moulting the bottle through burning in to 600 to 800 celcius for getting glass liquid which is formed the new and recle bottle by the shave in glass mould. In the end the bottle will be used again and selling to the supermarket

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Hirajamal 56 view
2020-01-28 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-25 snowsss 73 view
2020-01-25 snowsss 56 view
2020-01-22 mary.ssherr 67 view
Essays by user mashur naufal :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 693.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55921052632 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19724038392 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5229487451 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.625 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0886680297248 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432752628388 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264340323339 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656966701548 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191815756418 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.