The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 comparing to 2008.
As can be seen from the map, the medical centre experienced a dramatic transformation with the addition of an education room, a mother and child room, a pharmacy and a store room.
In 2008, there existed a small medical centre with a limited number of rooms. The main entrance leading to waiting room was in the south. The corridor was the way to three doctor’s offices, the treatment room in the north and the staff office in the middle. There was a laboratory on the right -hand corner of the centre.
In 2010, the medical centre was expanded with an education room and a mother and chid room installed on the left-hand corner. A new pharmacy was constructed next to the laboratory. Doctor’s offices are downsized to make room for one more doctor’s office and a store room on the top right-hand corner.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- The graph shows the average Japanese month salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white televisions and color televisions during the same period 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81761006289 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72009488476 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7846221276 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1111111111 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.222222222222 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263359208412 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149534778209 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.306371569398 0.0843802449381 363% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298650140688 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.404959861579 0.0819641961636 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.