Without any doubt, employees holding university degree deserve higher salaries compared the other people with lower education levels. It does not seem to be fair to request the complete costs of the university education from individuals who tend to attend universities.
It is obvious that a university degree requires intensive effort and study at least for (for at least?) four years. In addition to that, students cannot have the opportunity to work in full time jobs and earn enough money to meet their basic needs during their university studies. On the other hand, graduates have various valuable skills and knowledge regarding their professions. Education enables them to approach professionally and adapt rapidly to the technical problems regardless having real work experience. Taking all the above mentioned points into consideration, there is no doubt that educated people should be paid with higher salaries than the others.
On the other hand, well-educated individuals provide valuable and infrequent workforce which is crucial for numerous sectors. Education has also positive effects on society’s life in terms of social and politic aspects. Furthermore, statistics demonstrate that people with high education levels also play a significant role in the scientific achievements compared to the ones without university degree. Eventually, it is clear that well educated workers are valuable for both companies and the society. Therefore the authorities should promote university education by supporting the students in economic ways rather than billing the complete costs to the young people who have tendency to receive university education.
In conclusion, people should keep in mind that education is a significant investment for the prosperity of every nation. I am of the opinion that education costs are being exceedingly paid by the educated workers in long terms and governments should keep supporting young students during their studies in order to establish a well-educated nation.
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 73
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...res intensive effort and study at least for for at least? four years. In addition to th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Four
...rt and study at least for for at least? four years. In addition to that, students ca...
^^^^
Line 2, column 183, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
... cannot have the opportunity to work in full time jobs and earn enough money to meet thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ble for both companies and the society. Therefore the authorities should promote universi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, at least, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60855263158 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93661211312 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8735250946 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308803920292 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987199538399 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545323843198 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195854211792 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305595479365 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.