The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015

Essay topics:

The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France, America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015

The line graph provides information about the regular quantity of students from Vietnam who studied in three different nations between 2000 and 2015.
Overall, obvious while the figure for international students from Vietnam applying to France ans America increased significantly over the period, Russia witnessed slightly declined in the number of Vietnamese student enrolling.
In 2000, the figure for Vietnamese students studying in America was nearly 1.5 millions, which was the lowest in comparison with those in France and Russia (around 3.5 and 3 millions respectively). Over the next five years, the quantity of students from Vietnam enrolling in America increased slightly to more than 2 millions students. Whereas, both France and Russia saw a considerable decrease in the Vietnamese students applying.
From 2005 to 2015, America experienced a significant rise in the number of Vietnamese students and reached 5 millions Vietnamese students at the end of the period. From the year 2010 on wards, the number of Vietnamese students attending school rose in all three nations. The figure for students from Vietnam in France remained steady until 2010, later it went up sharply to the end of the period. By contrast, in Russia, there was a drop to below 2 millions pupils in 2010 and then increased moderately at 2.5 millions students in 2015.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-19 L_i_n_h_coi 61 view
2022-09-19 L_i_n_h_coi 61 view
2021-08-29 Giang Tran view
2021-08-29 Giang Tran 56 view
2021-08-29 Giang Tran 67 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fferent nations between 2000 and 2015. Overall, obvious while the figure for in...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of Vietnamese student enrolling. In 2000, the figure for Vietnamese stude...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in the Vietnamese students applying. From 2005 to 2015, America experienced a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28837209302 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78652401079 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2601327646 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406111075716 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177760847365 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700863642182 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252072650601 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229542019857 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.