the pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps show how the city, known as “Shipsmouth”, shifted at a very fast pace.
Overall, Shipsmouth has experienced a significant modernization, with far more buildings and transport facilities.
On the left of the maps, the green area in the north corner has demolished and replaced by apartment blocks which provide more accommodations. The factory next to city centre has been removed by shopping centre. In addition, new football stadium has been introduced and located near shopping mall. It is noticeable that train station still remained and the new one has been constructed in the opposite side.
On the right side of the city, the church in front of city centre has converted into pub. Another striking change is the change from houses into skyscrapers in the middle and the east. Trees in the east south has been cut down and turned into airport. There has seen a road for pedestrians in the city centre which used to allow for car only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | rubingocnguyen1991 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Hien16698 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Shahrear59 | 67 | view |
- The exploration and development of the safe alternatives to fossil fuel should be the most important global priority today. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 61
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 78
- the pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same work or the same work conditions for life. Discuss the possible causes and suggest ways to prepare for people to work in the future. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95061728395 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9963143544 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.2894339991 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.2 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0405096627334 0.215688989381 19% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0149867324949 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0254896665127 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0261885620567 0.15604864568 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152764050664 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.