the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000
The provided pie charts demonstrate the data about producing of electricity with using of fuel In two countries (Australia and France) in two decades(1980 and 2000).Overall , in Australia electricity was manufactured more by coal whereas in France experienced more nuclear power
Initially, in 1980 a half of total production was produced by coal while natural gas ,oil, and nuclear power were used in production of electricity in number of 20,10 and 20 correspondently in Australia . After two decades there was witnessed a significant change , 130 per cent of electricity power was fulfilled by coal and more than one third of total was hydro power whilst a tiny miniority(2%) of production accounted for oil and gas
In France , every fifth of total made up by oil while coal, natural gas , hydro power and nuclear power consisted of 25,25, 15 and 5 respectively in 1980. France saw a dramatically increase in using of Nuclear power (126%) after two decades whilst a quarter of total consisted of coal and oil each one and two per cent of production was natural gas and hydro power accordingly.
To sum up , Australia tried to use more coal whereas France produce by nuclear power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- the diagrams below show the growth in population of australia in 2001 91
- Some people think that scientists expirementing with animals in a labaratory is the only way we can guarantee new products will be safe for human use 61
- The graph below shows the consuption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european county between 1979 and 2004 73
- the given graph shows information about meat consumption in europe 73
- some people think that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime .Others ,however, argue that the circomstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for commiting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided pie charts demonstrate the data about producing of electricity with...
^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...el In two countries Australia and France in two decades1980 and 2000.Overall , in...
^^
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...and France in two decades1980 and 2000.Overall , in Australia electricity was manufact...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nce in two decades1980 and 2000.Overall , in Australia electricity was manufactur...
^^
Line 2, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n was produced by coal while natural gas ,oil, and nuclear power were used in prod...
^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0,10 and 20 correspondently in Australia . After two decades there was witnessed a...
^^
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...there was witnessed a significant change , 130 per cent of electricity power was f...
^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion accounted for oil and gas In France , every fifth of total made up by oil whi...
^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very fifth of total made up by oil while coal, natural gas , hydro power and nucl...
^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... made up by oil while coal, natural gas , hydro power and nuclear power consisted...
^^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clear power consisted of 25,25, 15 and 5 respectively in 1980. France saw a dram...
^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and 5 respectively in 1980. France saw a dramatically increase in using of Nucl...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...nd 5 respectively in 1980. France saw a dramatically increase in using of Nuclear power 126% after tw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... and hydro power accordingly. To sum up , Australia tried to use more coal wherea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, if, third, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96954314721 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94319207278 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472081218274 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => Sentence length is too long
Sentence length SD: 152.78968388 43.030603864 355% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 244.75 112.824112599 217% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.25 22.9334400587 215% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189765894635 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127561292359 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101768080483 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138967552221 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086094534514 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.6 13.2329268293 201% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 61.2550243902 35% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.4 10.3012195122 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 11.4329268293 262% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.