The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Units of electricity by fuel sourc

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Units of electricity by fuel source in Australia
In 1980, Total production 100 units In 2000, Total production 100 units
Coal 50 Coal 130
Natural Gas 20 Natural Gas 2
Nuclear power Nuclear power
Oil 10 Oil 2
Hydro power 20 Hydro power 36

Units of electricity by fuel source in France
In 1980, Total production 90 units In 2000, Total production 180 units
Coal 25 Coal 25
Natural Gas 25 Natural Gas 2
Nuclear power 15 Nuclear power 126
Oil 20 Oil 25
Hydro power 5 Hydro power 2

The pie charts illustrate the changes in electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France between 1980 and 2000.

Overall, the total electricity production increased significantly in both countries, with Australia rising from 100 to 170 units and France from 90 to 180 units.

In Australia, coal was the predominant source, with production surging from 50 units in 1980 to 130 units in 2000, representing the largest change. Hydropower also saw a notable increase from 20 units to 36 units. In contrast, electricity generated from natural gas and oil decreased sharply, both dropping from 20 and 10 units respectively to just 2 units by 2000.

In France, the most significant change was in nuclear power, which escalated dramatically from 15 units in 1980 to 126 units in 2000. Electricity production from coal remained unchanged at 25 units. Oil production experienced a slight increase from 20 units to 25 units. Similar to Australia, the contribution of natural gas to electricity production plummeted, falling from 25 units in 1980 to 2 units in 2000. Hydropower also saw a reduction from 5 units to 2 units over the same period.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-07 Sajib Ahamed 67 view
2024-07-07 Sajib Ahamed 67 view
Essays by user Sajib Ahamed :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14893617021 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03931534307 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489361702128 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3368450729 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323401473808 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168017383364 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110944707776 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258938209515 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118987412272 0.0819641961636 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.