The charts give information about the proportion of money spent and received by children`s charity in the USA in a year.
Overall, The most significant facts to emerge from the charts are that total revenues ($53,561,580) of children`s charity has a higher number than total expenditures ($53,224,896). In addition, While the figure for donated food shows its superiority over that for other revenue sources, that for program services dominates the expenditures from children's charity.
Regarding the amount of the income, donated food has a larger percentage accounting for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this section. This is followed by Community contributions, program revenue, and other income, which are listed at 10.4%, 2.2%,and 0.4% (of total revenue) each. The exceptions are investment income and government grant that have a similar amount, standing at 0.2% of total revenue ̶ the smallest proportion of income in children’s charity.
Turning to the proportion of outcome, program services have the highest level of money that children’s charity spent, which is noted at 95.8% of total expenditures. Moreover, not only there is fundraising, but there is also management and general becoming the lowest level of this area. While the former is recorded at 2.6% of total expenditures, the latter is accounted for 1.6% of total expenditures.
- The diagram below shows how central heating system in a house works. 95
- The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 73
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1 and S2) have been proposed. 67
- The table below shows the information about the underground railway system in six cities. 56
- The table below shows the information about the underground railway system in six cities. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge accounting for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this secti...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...accounting for 86.6% of total revenue ̶ the greatest proportion in this section....
^^
Line 5, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mount, standing at 0.2% of total revenue ̶ the smallest proportion of income in c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50934579439 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11525272583 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53738317757 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9405778703 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218061886856 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106602823782 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143960281336 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189308318763 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168452487743 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.