The pie chart illustrates the significant causes of degradation of agricultural land worldwide and the table exhibits reasons for the land degradation in North America, Europe and Oceania.
Overall, the most significant contributor to land degradation is overgrazing followed by deforestation and over-cultivation. The maximum percentage of land is degraded in Europe and minimum in North America.
Maximum percentage of land is degraded by over-grazing, exactly 35%. Oceania has the maximum percentage of over-grazing land among three regions, which is 11.3% while North America has 1.5% of the over-grazed land, which is minimum among three regions. Deforestation and over-cultivation have almost same percentage of degraded land, which is 30% and 28% respectively. Among three regions, Europe has the maximum percentage of over-cultivation land, exactly 7.7%, which is about double of North America, which has 3.3%. Europe also has the maximum percentage of land degraded by deforestation, which is 9.8% followed by Oceania and North America.
- In order to reduce costs, we should close some of our existing small assembly plants and build a large central plant. Grandview would be an ideal location for this new plant. First, of the locations that we have considered, Grandview has the largest adult 90
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 79
- "Over 80 percent of the respondents to a recent survey indicated a desire to reduce theirintake of foods containing fats and cholesterol, and today low-fat products abound in manyfood stores. Since many of the food products currently marketed by Old 66
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.85567010309 233% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 937.175257732 96% => OK
No of words: 155.0 206.0 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78709677419 4.54256449028 127% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.78020617076 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39083664498 2.54303337028 133% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 127.690721649 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432258064516 0.622605031667 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.41237113402 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3050865276 44.8134815571 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 16.8248392259 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 4.34317383033 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 7.41237113402 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910441133965 0.216113520407 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531774684455 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476441055858 0.0603063233224 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090016065355 0.12726935374 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607290186195 0.0580467560999 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 8.37731958763 185% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 70.7449484536 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 3.82989690722 339% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 7.45979381443 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 8.71597938144 187% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.