The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s
The agriculture productivity which shown by chart below was decreasing caused by three specific reasons followed by a table of three region affected by those reasons in 1990s. One of the exacerbated agriculture production was an over-grazing which figure was 35%.
As is observed, Europe was the biggest degraded area compare to the other developed countries in North America. Deforestation had been a big problem not only in Europe but also in the other side of the world which shown 9,8% and 30% respectively. While over-grazing was the most worldwide causes, it shown the least figure in Europe.
The other interesting data shown that over-cultivation was the third cause worldwide, however, it was not a big problem in Oceania. Its largest cause of land degradation was over-grazing. It was merely the highest figure among other regions.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Comparison of hockey and soccer 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
...ic reasons followed by a table of three region affected by those reasons in 1990s. One...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
... three region affected by those reasons in 1990s. One of the exacerbated agriculture pro...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 711.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04313750446 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5371660593 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.875 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130305342604 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621224557709 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107039738112 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100216092872 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099326903961 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.