The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the root causes of agriculture land which becomes less productive. Whereas, the table provides information about the reasons for degredation in the various lands of the world, namely; North America, Europe and Oceania during the 1990s.
Overall, the most prevalent reason for degradation land worldwide among the others was over-grazing and the Europe had the highest degraded land compared to other regions.
According to the pie chart, over-grazing was dominant cause that led to land degradation globally, accounted for virtually one-third percent. It was followed closely by deforestation, over-cultivation as well as other reasons which represented 30, 28 and 7 percent respectively. However, it is worth to take into account that there was the highest proportion of unproductive land in the Europe with 23%. The deforestation, as we can see, was the main cause for degradation for the Continent. The next region of non-productive land was Oceania with 13%, however the main contribution to this came from over-grazing. Conversely, the North-America showed the highest proportion of productive land with a merely 5%, which in turn was virtually caused by over-cultivation.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 56
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 71
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 61
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, so, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57608695652 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32954849712 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0876054559 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211585027778 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999338747228 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752069965101 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1628328551 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106339667752 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.