In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport
Disucss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a widespread belief that it is a good idea to uplift expenditures on building more new railway stations, which lets people to move fast from country to another one readily enough. It is often argued that this is a positive development, whereas some people hold the opinion that it is more preferable to invest more money on expanding and upgrading current public transport. It is agreed that an increase spending on public transport is more beneficial for many citizens. This essay will discuss both points of view before coming to a reasoned conclusion.
It is clear that the public transportation is one of the most convenient and cheapest at the present time that allows individuals to reach their destination readily, even in bustling cities. Moreover, public transport that includes: buses, underground as well as trams are operated in all corners of cities, making people's journey's shorter which in turn, helps them to get their work on time. It is therefore a greed that expanding public transport is more worthwhile by investing more money rather than constructing new railway lines. Moscow is a prime example, where the demands for railway are less than any country because its authorities contribute more on extending public transportation's routes and improving the quality of these transports.
However, many disagree and feel that these excessive quantity of expanses on enhancing public transportation is likely to rise some issues such as: increasing the level of fumes, pollution of air, water and so on. Therefore, some authorities prefer invest a great amount of money on building additional railway lines because it is considered that this mode of transportation is environmentally friendly and it does not emit any harmful substances that might be dangerous to surrounding area. Yet, it is worth to take into account, not all terrains are suitable to lay and construct new lines, but in case if there were appropriate places to build, so it might require either chop down too much trees or demolish some recreational areas, particularly beside the countryside in order to construct these lines.
By a way of conclusion, while the benefits of investing more money on transportation, mainly public transports allow citizens to move faster, some still feel that this spending ought to be invested on constructing new railway lines rather than on other modes of transport. As far as, building these lines might demand huge destructions, thus spending money on public transportation is clearly positive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 81
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more worthwhile by investing more money rather than constructing new railway lin...
^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es prefer invest a great amount of money on building additional railway lines bec...
^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...o it might require either chop down too much trees or demolish some recreational are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23095823096 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96477233133 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565110565111 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3978505391 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.769230769 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3076923077 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230956276757 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878906587754 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452928776414 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154232800734 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373155634011 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.