The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie graph illustrates the causative factors leading to the decreased quality of agricultural land in the world. The following table gives information about how those three continents had been impacted on by the same causes in 1990s.
Overall, Over-grazing had the highest figure for land degradation, while each region was affected the most by three completely different reasons. In addition, the percentage of land in Europe degraded was recorded the highest figure.
Looking at the pie chart, over-grazing proportion was 35 percents, and the figures for deforestation was lower at 30 percents and 28 percents respectively. The other reasons accounted for the fourth-fold percentage of the figure for over-cultivation.
The highest figure was Europe’s land degradation percentage, with 23 percents, was influenced significantly by deforestation with 9.8 percents, followed by 7.7 percents and 5.5 percents of over-cultivation and over-grazing in orders. Instead, over-grazing, which was 11.3 percents, was the highest factor leading to land degradation in Oceania from the overall 13 percents, compared to 1.7 percents of deforestation and no records of over-cultivation. However, in North America, over-cultivation accounted for 3.3 percents from the total 5%, while 1.5 percents and 0.2 percents were those over-grazing’s and deforestation’s percentages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | osama hafiz | view | |
| 2020-08-12 | tungductranjra16k73 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | Hellan Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-22 | peterlinguini | 56 | view |
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2000 to 2004 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...had been impacted on by the same causes in 1990s. Overall, Over-grazing had the highest...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88944723618 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64095927328 2.65546596893 137% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9266128099 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0902856124314 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536878021596 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512564046055 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845028200323 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734159446109 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.4140731707 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.