The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
The pie chart reveals that there are three main reasons that cause degradation of land around the world while the table illustrates the effects by those causes to three different regions during the 1900s.
Overall, one of the reasons which affected agricultural land was overgrazing and the region that had the highest percent of land degraded was Europe.
The first chart shows the proportion of factors that caused land degradation during the 1990s. It can be seen that the major reason was overgrazing which corresponded to 35% of cultivate land worldwide. Over deforestation accounted for 30% degradation of cultivate land, while over cultivation resulted 28% of land degradation. All other minor reasons are categorized as "other" and constitute 7%.
The second chart indicates the percentage of regions that were negatively affected by land degradation. As can be seen from chart, the highest rate of land degradation had occurred in Europe at a rate of about 23%, in comparison with Oceania at 13% approximately.North America accounted for 5%.On the other hand, the most detrimental for about 9.8% as opposed to 1.7% in Oceania. Overgrazing which was a main factor that negatively affected land predominated with 11% of the proportion in Oceania. Although, over cultivation did not harm agricultural land in Oceania. It was main reason that led to degradation in North America, which accounted 3.3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-26 | osama hafiz | view | |
| 2020-08-12 | tungductranjra16k73 | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | Hellan Nguyen | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-22 | peterlinguini | 56 | view |
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table show how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 56
- The map above shows the changes that have taken place in meadowside villages and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 84
- The pie chart below show the rate of online shopping sales for retail sector in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: North
...rison with Oceania at 13% approximately.North America accounted for 5%.On the other h...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...ximately.North America accounted for 5%.On the other hand, the most detrimental fo...
^^
Line 4, column 498, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... with 11% of the proportion in Oceania. Although, over cultivation did not harm agricult...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33928571429 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12401770276 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9149828703 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.727272727 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287388813093 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124147892771 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103061301966 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204163940503 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880448246229 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.