The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned pie chart reveals the main reasons for less production in agricultural land while the table reflects the affected three areas due to these causes during the 1990s.
Overall, as it can be seen on the pie chart that over-grazing is the dominant causes for land degradation whereas it is clear from the table that Europe is the most affected region for land degradation.
It is evident that a large area of the land had been affected most due to over-grazing which had a figure of 35%. Similarly, it was followed by deforestation with 30%. Furthermore, it was slightly lower in case of Over-cultivation (28%). Meanwhile, the other causes for land degradation accounted for only 7%.
Also, it can be seen from the table that Europe is the most affected continent for land degradation with 23% which constitute of deforestation of 9.8%, over-cultivation of 7.7% and over-grazing of 5.5%. Likewise, Oceania had a total figure of 13% with 1.7% due to deforestation, 11.3% because of over-grazing and over-cultivation had no contribution. However, only 5% land were degraded in North America which comprised of 0.2% deforestation, 3.3% over-cultivation and 1.5% over-grazing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 405, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
... 5% land were degraded in North America which comprised of 0.2% deforestation, 3.3% over-cultivati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25654450262 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40000661101 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3339013831 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166300370062 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07966621417 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117429953907 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156794041008 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139870551824 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.