Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of the society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, children's social behaviour and education have become a controversial topic. In present context, it is considered by some folks of society that guardians are only responsible to make their children social whereas it is argued that it is duty of school to teach pupils good manners. From my point of view, I strongly believe that both parents and teachers are equally responsible in up- bringing of children. This essay will examine both arguments in depth.
On the one hand, it is believed that home is the first school of children so their parents should teach them to become socially fit in society. Similarly, parents play crucial role in making their children good members of society. In addition, every family should teach children to behave well with other members. For instance, respecting seniors whereas loving the juniors.
On the other hand, school is regarded as the major institution where pupils can learn social manners. Along with family, school has a significant role in shaping the behaviour of the students where they should be taught to be in discipline, follow rules and regulations. Likewise, teachers also have great role in making students creative and innovative which further helps students to build their career also.
Analyzing the both aspects, I strongly believe that both parents as well as school play important role in developing the character and future of a child. It is often believed that children are the raw clay which takes any shape we provide. So, I personally find family and teachers as two part of coin which is incomplete without each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Skhanuman1 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | phungnguyen1611 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Chi Hoang | 82 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | Chi Hoang | 61 | view |
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 71
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 81
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and inclu 89
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 56
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...er helps students to build their career also. Analyzing the both aspects, I stron...
^^^^
Line 7, column 66, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s, I strongly believe that both parents as well as school play important role in developin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, similarly, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1216730038 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58028988259 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562737642586 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4312168487 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27470809579 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897122692065 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065067512426 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160993436722 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643912522697 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.