The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The pie chart provides information about four reasons explaining why agriculture land worldwide degraded during the 1990s. The table depicts the mentioned causes affected to agriculture land in three distinct regions. Overall, it is clear that overgrazing was the main reason that made farmland on global to be degraded, and Europe had the highest percentage of total land degraded caused by given causes.
Looking at the first chart; 35% of land degradation was due to overgrazing, the percentages of the causes forestation and over-cultivation were lower, which accounted for 30% and 28% respectively. It is interesting to note that there was only 7% of other reasons that led to the degradation of global farmland.
Turning to the second chart, we can see that Europe experienced the highest percentage of degraded land, at 23% in total; therein 9.8% of land degradation was due to deforestation, while over-cultivation and overgrazing caused 7.7% and 5.5% of farmland degradation respectively. Meanwhile, Oceania had 13% of degraded farmland, and this was only due to forestation (1.7%) and overgrazing (11.7%). Regarding North America, comparing with other regions, this continent had the lowest percentage of land degradation (5%). The primary cause was over-cultivation, caused 3.3% of degraded farmland compared to the impact of overgrazing (1.5%) and a minor percentage of 0.2% affected by deforestation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'causes'' or 'cause's'?
Suggestion: causes'; cause's
... to overgrazing, the percentages of the causes forestation and over-cultivation were l...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5069124424 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29505655395 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5697759578 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.777777778 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.13902439024 790% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176663442731 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986204748989 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881902428336 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152446393546 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114572292252 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.