The charts below give information about world's spending, world's population and consumption of resources.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the percentage of world spending, world population and consumption of resources. Overall, it is clear that the number of population in Asia is the highest. Also, the proportion of resources consumed in USA and Europe is much higher than in other countries.
As can be seen, the amount of food consumption is the highest, accounting for 24% of total world's spending. This number is considerably higher the figure for clothing, at 6%. On the other hand, the second highest factor invested is transportation, with 18%, and a slightly lower percent of 12% spending for clothing. Finally, only 40% of spending for others which is not mentioned in these charts.
Asia has the highest number of population, accounting for 57% of world's population. The population of Europe and the USA is significantly lower, only 14% respectively. However, the figure for resources that both areas consume is biggest, 60% compared to only 40% in the consumption of resources in other regions. In terms of population in Africa, this area only accounts for 10% of world's population which outnumber two times the population of other regions.
- The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U S state of Oregon 84
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 63
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 76
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion OTEC 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12299465241 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.950389072 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.713707561 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0909090909 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140051445555 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656115523663 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943004967237 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117911851498 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644335869471 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.