The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
The pie chart provides information about the four main causes of land degradation globally. The table illustrates the reasons for degraded land by regions throughout the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that the largest part of total land degraded was in Europe and this was caused mainly by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing.
In can be seen from the graph that 65% of land degradation stemmed from over-grazing and deforestation, 35% and 30% respectively. Similarly, the percentage of worldwide land degradation stood at slightly less than a third. However, other causes constituted the smallest proportion of earth degradation globally (7%).
Regarding the causes of land degradation by region, the biggest part of total land degraded was in Europe (23%) compared to North America and Oceania (5% and 13% respectively). To be more precise, deforestation and over-cultivation made up nearly a tenth each of entire earth degradation in Europe, while over-grazing comprised 5.5% of all land degradation. Taking into account in North America, over-cultivation contributed considerably to total land degradation by 3.3% compared to deforestation (0.2%) and over-grazing (1.5%). In contrast, over-cultivation account for 0% of total land degraded in Oceania, whereas the biggest percentage of degradation made up over-grazing (13%) and deforestation constituted around 2% of land degradation in Oceania.
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects. Others believe that teenager should focus on that subject in which they are more interested. Discuss of both opinion. 67
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, regarding, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.97073170732 529% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74162679426 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58969677568 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531100478469 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5895821433 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123384021062 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759047305207 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641088507824 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113253209759 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863413067244 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.