Some people believe that it is good to share information in research, business and the academic world. Some others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the last century, the word has been facing a tremendous increase in the number of information in all fields such as science and business. people have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In this essay, I will negotiate both views and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, several people claim that a plethora of information ought to be open freely to society. The strongest argument that it provides us with up-to-date information regarding medical achievements and the development of technologies that could facilitate our day-to-day lives. For example, researchers may reach faster outstanding results by sharing knowledge in between namely the evolution of new cancer drugs or stem cells. In the same way, the new technologies like internet broaden people’s cognition about other cultures, cuisines and geographic features of lands.
On the other hand, several people suppose that some information should not be available for everyone that might be dangerous for folks if this data reveals. First of all, information regarding the technologies of weapons or nuclear science, which could be used against inhabitants. For example, if this data had uncovered for terrorists, it might lead to wars or terrorist attacks. Moreover, information concerning companies’ secrets namely algorithms and protocols have to be kept confidential trying to maintain a competitive edge or safeguard new discoveries over other companies.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that some information is overmuch sensitive and confidential and cannot be revealed to everyone.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 3
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ll fields such as science and business. people have different views about whether or n...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ness. people have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.552 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07928303343 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.628 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6663074696 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248646762064 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852250911893 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582469613918 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151868393449 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301900718963 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.