the pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical australian household, and the table shoes the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants.
The presented pie chart shows the rate of consumption of energy in Australia for different household. However, the table depicts the vivid range of electricity used on the basis of the number of people in a house. The data for a pie chart and table is calibrated in percentages and kilowatt hours per year, respectively.
Overall, the range of electricity increases with an increase in number of occupants at home besides this, heating and cooling consuming maximum energy proportion.
First, let us look at the pie chart. It is clearly visible, heating and cooling consumes 38% of total energy consumption. Likewise, water heating also takes higher energy level which amounts to one fourth of the total. Other appliances inclusive of clothes and dish washers, entertainment and small appliances (toaster, hairdryer and iron) amounts to 16% of total consumption. Surprisingly, Lighting, fridges and freezers both amount to 7% while standby power and cooking are only 3% and 4% respectively.
Now moving onto the table, it is noticeable, if there is only one member in a house the electricity would range between 5000-6500 kWh but it will range 6000-8500 kWh per year if the occupants double. Similarly, for 3 members in a house electricity is used in between 7500-1000 kWh per year and if the number of occupants reach 6 or more the electricity used will be 12,000-16,000 kWh per year.
To conclude, one can decipher, only person at home is least, but it skyrockets if the member increase to 6 or more. On the other hand, the consumption level for heating and cooling is observed to be more than any other purpose. Stand by power intakes the least among all.
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree? 73
- the pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical australian household, and the table shoes the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants. 80
- some people get into debt by buying things they don't need and cant afford.what are the reasons for this behaviors?what action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 67
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the united kingdoms, sweden, itlay, and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'appliances'' or 'appliance's'?
Suggestion: appliances'; appliance's
...d dish washers, entertainment and small appliances toaster, hairdryer and iron amounts to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, likewise, look, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 6.8 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 279.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9605734767 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85831451126 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3595641014 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8571428571 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219737875582 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737517702401 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689235876685 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117518284898 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100837779836 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.