The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of electricity used according to the number of occupants.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided pie and table graphs represent an overview of household energy use and amount of electricity used per in Australia. The units are in percentage from 0 to 100 in the pie-chart, while Kilowatt hours per year in the table.
Overall, it is clearly seen that, an Australian’s households use a significant energy for heating and cooling purposes; whereas, the lower percentage of energy uses for stand by power and cooking purposes. In addition, the number of person increased in the house, similarly, the amount of electricity ascended to use in an Australian’s home.
From the pie chart, the highest percentage of people use electric energy for heating and cooling purposes and it is 38%; Whereas, the lowest percentage of people consume for stand by power and cooking purposes; there are 3% and 4% respectively. Furthermore, 25% of energy is consumed by Australians for water heating; nonetheless, 16% of energy is used by them for other applications. Only seven percentage energy use for lighting and fridges and freezers purposes.
According to the table, single person used 5,000 - 6,000 electricity; in contrast, six or more person consumed twice to the single person and it was 12,000 - 16,000 per year. Moreover, two persons used 6,000 - 8,500 electric energy, while three people were 1,500 more than to the couple of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-26 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | xiao_alatus | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | oanhthunthin | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-03 | oanhthunthin | 70 | view |
| 2020-12-24 | sonia 7022 | 87 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Write about the following topic.Instead of training a few athletes to win medals at the Olympics, governments should spend the money on programmes encouraging the public to be active and stay healthy.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this state 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-chart, while Kilowatt hours per year in the table. Overall, it is clearly seen...
^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople were 1,500 more than to the couple of people.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18721461187 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9847194914 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8249581998 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.222222222 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245653730426 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123341226458 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071540440835 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166103582306 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657723404567 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.