The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The provided bar graph depicts the percentages of Britisher, who can identify to the image of the four different people (Queen, Prime Minister, Chancellor and Mayor of London) with the different four ages.
In summary, the maximum percentages of people recognise to the different ages photos of the Queen compares to the other three people.
As to the bar chart, almost 100% of people easily identify to the Queen's all ages of photos. As opposed to this, only 20% of people recognise to the Mayor of London's image (when their age is until 20), while, 40% of people identify when their age is above 60 year. Furthermore, sixty percent of people determine to the picture of the London's mayor and their age is between 20 and 60. 20% and 30% of people identify to the Chancellor's photos when their age is 0-20 and 21-40 respectively. Whereas, 70% of people determine the image of their age is above 40 year. On the image of the Prime Minister, people recognise 50%,80%,90% and nearly 60% to their age is 0-20, 21-40, 41-60 and above 60 year respectively.<br>
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-03 | ppatel | 56 | view |
2020-01-03 | ppatel | 61 | view |
2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 11 | view |
2020-01-03 | Shivam7090 | 11 | view |
2020-01-03 | ppatel | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 73
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minute 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, and the protection is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 67
- Should students be allowed to choose which classes they take, or should they be required to take the same classes as everyone else?What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach to education?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevan 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bove 60 year. Furthermore, sixty percent of people determine to the picture of th...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yor and their age is between 20 and 60. 20% and 30% of people identify to the Ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir age is 0-20 and 21-40 respectively. Whereas, 70% of people determine the image of t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, whereas, while, as to, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73369565217 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63191096739 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461956521739 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0023436813 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13594653365 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760246960678 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302951413417 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806767550179 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345514642278 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.