the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego, California, and the rest of the world
The chart gives information about the proportion of using water for residential, industry, and agriculture in San Diego, California, and worldwide
It’s obvious that water usage for homes is more than for industry and agriculture in the American regions. By contrast, the proportion of consuming water by agriculture accounts for the vast majority of the water used in the rest of the world
In San Diego County and California, residential water consumption takes up 60% and 39% of the total water usage. However, this figure is completely opposite to the world as a whole. Just only 8% of the water used for homes can be described throughout the chart shown.
A dramatic difference can be witnessed in the percentage of agricultural water consumers with more than two-thirds, but only 17% and 28% water usage in San Diego Country and California respectively. A similar proportion can be seen in industry water usage with 23% in San Diego Country and worldwide, while this figure for California is 10% higher, at 33%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-27 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-05 | zee7 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Mabel Nguyenn | 67 | view |
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 73
- the pie chart compares water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast food Many people think that it s good to eat traditional foods while others believe that fast food is a good choice Discuss both views and give a good choice 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships between people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92102795734 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526627218935 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6794860641 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382902328136 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193393916014 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865036267578 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246522795037 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348823533528 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.