The pie charts compare the percentage of people visiting the America from different countries between 1988 and 1992
Overall, the figures of people coming from Mexico was the highest despite of decreasing significantly, on the other hand, that of Canadians visiting the US was the lowest in 1988 but by 1992, the number of Chinese was the lowest. It can be seen that, the percentage of people coming from Canada tended to increase relatively, on the contrary, the proportion of Chinese and Mexicans decreased while from others experienced a slight fluctuation over the years shown.
In 1988, the number of visitors was from Mexico up to 53% but this figure decreased significantly in 4 years and by 1992 (only 40% ) but still leading in the percentage of people visiting the US. Whereas, Canada was a country with the lowest proportion of visitors America in 1988 at only 10% but after a substantial increase in this and peaked at 30% in 1992.
As for China, the figures of visitors to the US reached 12% in 1988 and decreased only 4% during the mentioned period. Lastly, other countries, the proportion of visitors was a quarter in the first year, and then declined to a fifth in 1990 and increased at 26% in 1992.
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 84
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 67
The charts show data about
The charts show data about tourists to the US from Canada, Mexico, China, and others between 1988 and 1992.
It can be seen that number of Canadian and Mexican all increased, while there was significant decrease of people from China and others. Although having gone down, proportion of other countries was still the highest, on the other hand, after the decrease, China’s proportion became the lowest figure.
From 1988 to 1990, visitors from Canada and China all fell down, percentage of Canadian went down from 25% to 20%, Chinese’s percentage decreased from 12% to 9%. On the other hand, Mexico’s tourists given to America had dramatical increase, Mexican’s proportion jumped from10% to 28%. In the same period, percentage of guest from other countries significantly declined 10%.
In the period from 1990 to 1992, Mexican tourists’ proportion continued to grow 2%, when this figure of China kept dropping from 9% to 4%. With the same as Mexico, after the decrease, percentage of Canadian’s visitors rose 6%. On the other hand, although number of tourists from other countries still fell down, with 40% of all tourists travelling to US, they always were the highest over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ficantly in 4 years and by 1992 only 40% but still leading in the percentage of p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, still, then, whereas, while, as for, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1007.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77251184834 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67792223407 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497630331754 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0900353174 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.833333333 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1666666667 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8333333333 5.23603664747 302% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315149306935 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156675479586 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806623925873 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232084424098 0.15604864568 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109484523706 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.