The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.
The pie charts show the quantity of incomings and outgoings over a year of a children charitable organization based in the USA.
Overall, donated food accounted for the majority of income while program services represented the greatest proportion of expenditures. Furthermore, Total revenue sources just exceeded outgoings.
The donated food comprised the highest percentage of entire revenue at 86,6 %, being approximately six times the figure for the total earnings of other sectors. The community contributions and program revenue followed with just over 10% and 2% respectively. The lowest proportions of revenue came from other income and government grants with the entire revenue at just under 1%.
Regarding expenditure, the children’s charity allocated the largest percentage of money to program services at 95,8%, being almost the total outgoings. Fundraising constituted the second-highest proportion at 2,6%, being slightly more than the percentage of the fund used for management.
According to the illustration, this charity organization earned exactly $53, 561,580 in this year and used up $53,224,896. Their saving in this year was just over 330,000 dollars.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays, more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same jobs. What problems this causes? What are solutions? 73
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 67
- For schoolchildren, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
... incomings and outgoings over a year of a children charitable organization based in the US...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...with just over 10% and 2% respectively. The lowest proportions of revenue came from...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83908045977 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1688998928 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0747707256 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133674550825 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554049193694 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906599767711 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924131951768 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105686489647 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.