The pie charts show the amount of revenue and expenditures over a year of a children’s charity in the USA. Overall, it can be seen that donated food accounted for the majority of the income, while program services accounted for the most expenditure. Total revenue sources just exceeded outgoings.
In detail, donated food provided most of the revenue for the charity, at 86%. Similarly, with regard to expenditures, one category, program services, accounted for nearly all of the outgoings, at 95.8%.
The other categories were much smaller. Community contributions, which were the second largest revenue source, brought in 10.4% of overall income, and this was followed by program revenue, at 2.2%. Investment income, government grants, and other income were very small sources of revenue, accounting for only 0.8% combined.
There were only two other expenditure items, fundraising and management and general, accounting for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. The total amount of income was $53,561,580, which was just enough to cover the expenditures of $53,224,896.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie graphs below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.pie comparison 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 73
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... program services, accounted for nearly all of the outgoings, at 95.8%. The other categ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, similarly, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54268292683 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96611715574 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603658536585 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3883671748 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116624801047 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607325875217 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159101596397 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737322170656 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987250541964 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.