The pie chart shows information about world resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada

The given pie charts give information about which resources of water in the world come from while the bar chart illustrates the figures for water in term of three categories of Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada including domestic, Industry and Agricultural consumed.

In can clearly be seen that the proportion of water's resources comes from fresh water when Egypt and Saudi Arabia showed a similar trend about using water in three fields.

Looking at the information from the pie chart, a considerable percentage of fresh water comes from ground, compares to 20% of ice water and 10% of water on surface.

Looking at the information from the bar chart, it is noticeable that the figure for Agricultural exceeded that of industry in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, but the reverse was true in Canada. The demand for domestic consuming water did not change position in relation to each other among three nations.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 759.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02649006623 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57545232823 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576158940397 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2771752437 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.8 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429062753426 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.226809440087 0.103423049105 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121837559257 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263099115467 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857482886324 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.