The pie graph provides information about the reasons for less productive land in the world, and the table illustrates how these causes influenced three regions in the world in 1990. From an overall perspective, it is evident that two primary reasons for this crisis were over-grazing and over-used planting areas. In addition, the highest percentage of degraded farmland was seen in Europe with deforestation as the main contributor to this problem.
In the first pie chart, over-grazing constituted for the biggest percentage of farmland degradation cause, followed by tree cutting practice and over-cultivation of a farm field at 30% and 28% respectively. In addition, just a small minority of this crisis was contributed by other factors (just below a tenth).
Moving to the table, 23% of the farming area in Europe in 1990 become less productive and this was caused by deforestation and over-used of farming area (9,8% and 7,7% each). In Oceania, just below 15% of farm area reported lost its function. Over 11% of this problem was led by over-grazing by livestock. In this area, however, there was no report indicating that the over-planting of farmland contributed to this crisis. Lastly, the least degraded land was shown in North America (5%). Over-used farm field was the leading contributor to this problem.
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your ow 67
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...farm field at 30% and 28% respectively. In addition, just a small minority of this...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, lastly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18779342723 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00484154571 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568075117371 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.5698855528 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.454545455 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133057572477 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562247669652 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10968906865 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108144342573 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985072082467 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.