The table below gives information about the daily cost of water per person in five different countries Figures are based on the minimum daily requirement per peron of 11 5 litres

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about the daily cost of water per person in five different countries. (Figures are based on the minimum daily requirement per peron of 11.5 litres.)

The table compares the amount of money paid by a person for daily water services in five different countries and how much it costs them in comparison to their average daily income. Overall, it is readily apparent that water utility costs in Tanzania and Uganda were the highest among the countries and this figure also made up the largest proportion of average daily income used to pay for water services in these countries.
To begin with, Tanzania and Uganda had the most significant amount of money needed to pay a person for the daily cost of water (the former accounted for $6.4 cents and the latter responsible for $ 4.1 cents). These costs made up 5.7% of the average daily wage in Tanzania and 3.2% of the daily average income of people in Uganda. Furthermore, the amount of money paid by Pakistanis for daily water utility costs was $1.76 cents and this was around 1.1% of the Pakistani average daily income.
Conversely, the British and Americans spent the least money to pay for daily water services ($1.3 and $0.85, respectively). In terms of the percentage of average wages used for paying for the water service, it only cost 0.013% of the daily income of people in the UK and 0.006% of the daily average income of people in America.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-02-26 Wardiati Yusuf 73 view
Essays by user Wardiati Yusuf :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$4'.
Suggestion: $4
....4 cents and the latter responsible for $ 4.1 cents. These costs made up 5.7% of th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, if, so, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6880733945 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36266845028 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449541284404 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.5771808194 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235019439905 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143106027602 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609688290777 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190612976047 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570626982798 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.