The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 & 2010. The pie chart shows the online sales for retail sectors in Canada in the year 2005 & 2010.
The pie charts compare sales of four sections of the retail sector in Canada between 2019 and 2010. The data is in the percentage.
Overall, it is seen clearly from both pie graphs that, the proportion of clothing and, home and kitchen appliances showed a downward trend, while electronics contributed the most in the period. And the percentage of groceries increased in the following year.
To comments with, the overall sales of clothing contributed the highest in 2019, which accounted for 38%. It declined by nearly 16% in 2020. Furthermore, home and kitchen had been given 29% share of the total, which decreased drastically by 18% in merely one year in this list in Canada.
Moreover, the percentage of electronics appliances and groceries comprised approximately 19% and 14% in 2019, both inclined to 45% and 22% in 2020 respectively. Where electronics things had the highest percentage in this category and, home and kitchen were at the least position in the year 2020 in Canada.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | rajpatel90 | 64 | view |
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07926829268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.829498256 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579268292683 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0845246117 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5555555556 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236421632566 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877153421427 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120764802842 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155745145557 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127510141067 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.