The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the traffic on roads creates many problems for policymakers. Some say the only way to enhance safety is to put more strict punishments on offences. This essay will explain the benefits of that policy and why I disagree with the given statement.
There are many reasons, which lead to more strict rules. To comments on if the government apply tough punishments on-road offences, which decrease the crime rate, this may lead to better road safety for people. For instance, the authority of china put strong rules for roads and people's safety on their major roads in china, as a result, nearly 74% of accidents declined to 23% in the six months. Despite strong rules on highways create obstacles for citizens many times, but it decreased accidents.
However, this type of policy creates many complex situations for the governing people. When road-related crimes’ punishments are more strict, people will try to avoid using their vehicles, leading to people not being interested in buying new ones. This may result in the economy in terms of the car industry. Nearly 40% of sales in the car sector decreased after the road policy made rules very harder for civils, which was introduced in UAE in 2019, which lead to more people public transports. Therefore, although this policy improves the security on roads, it has more disadvantages.
In conclusion, making more strong rules on roads improve safety but it decreases the economy. In my words, it is not an appropriate way to tackle safety-related issues on pathways because it has more demerits in terms of users than benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
- The maps 11
- The charts below give information about world spending and population 78
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four di erent mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 81
- The chart below give information about the high speed continuous internet connection of households in five countries in 2001 and 2002 69
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05303030303 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6443083879 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3975453082 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181553765503 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678779427898 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505781901576 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128061064248 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380007297275 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.