the pie chart shows the percentages of expenditure on different items in USA
The pie charts compare the proportions of spending on different items in the USA from 1966 to 1996.
Overall, It is clear that American citizens spent mostly on food while the least expenditure went to computers over the period
In terms of minor changes, There was hardly any change in expenditure on food over between 1996 and 1996 with the proportion increased by 1% from 44%.Additionally, The proportions of restaurant and petrol spendings were 7% and 9% respectively. While a rise by 3% was witnessed in the figure for restaurants, that of petrol slightly declined to 8%.
Regarding remarkable changes, expenditure on cars saw the biggest changes with a nearly three-fold decrease from the initial figure of 23%. In contrast, the figure for books doubled from 6% to14%.
However, there were equivalences in the percentages of computers and furniture with 1% and 10% respectively within three decades from 1966.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-12 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Some people think that telling the truth is not always essential It is necess y to tell lies sometimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Some people do not go directly to college but travel or work for a short time. Do you think it has more advantages or disadvantages? 11
- Internet Users as percentage of population 94
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Mobile phones and the Internet are very useful for old people. However, this section of population is the fewer users of mobile phones and the Internet. In what ways can mobile phones and the Internet be useful to the old people? How can the old people be 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t American citizens spent mostly on food while the least expenditure went to comp...
^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...the proportion increased by 1% from 44%.Additionally, The proportions of restaurant and petr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('nearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('three-fold') instead of another adjective.
...re on cars saw the biggest changes with a nearly three-fold decrease from the initial figure of 23%...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24161073826 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02985757673 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624161073826 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 103.317740759 43.030603864 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165602901482 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863549115703 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12815032288 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106521955813 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13125788469 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.