The pie charts above give a percentage of the Parkway Hotel’s customer service rating in 2005 and 2010.
It is clear from the chart that the number of visitors who rated for the service satisfactory, poor or very poor decreased significantly in 2010. Whereas, guests who felt the service was good or excellent increased rapidly at the same time.
By 2005, satisfactory percentage vote accounted for almost half of the pie with 45% vote while the number of people who voted excellence was the least (5%). But in contrast, the more people voted excellence for the hotel (28% in 2010), fewer people voted satisfaction for it (17% in 2010). The amount of good vote became the largest with the point 39% by 2010 and the least percentage was for to the very poor vote with 4% at that time though it was 15% in 2005. With the same decrease of very poor vote, a few people tended to vote for the customer service poor with the percentage 21% and 12% in 2005 and 2010 respectively.
The pie charts above give a percentage of the Parkway Hotel’s customer service rating in 2005 and 2010.
It is clear from the chart that the number of visitors who rated for the service satisfactory, poor or very poor decreased significantly in 2010. Whereas, guests who felt the service was good or excellent increased rapidly at the same time.
By 2005, satisfactory percentage vote accounted for almost half of the pie with 45% vote while the number of people who voted excellence was the least (5%). But in contrast, the more people voted excellence for the hotel (28% in 2010), fewer people voted satisfaction for it (17% in 2010). The amount of good vote became the largest with the point 39% by 2010 and the least percentage was for to the very poor vote with 4% at that time though it was 15% in 2005. With the same decrease of very poor vote, a few people tended to vote for the customer service poor with the percentage 21% and 12% in 2005 and 2010 respectively.
- The pie graphs above show the different amount of water used for residential needs, industrial and agricultural purposes in San Diego, California and the World. It is clear that the water usage in the three places is generally different. In San Diego and 67
- The line chart above compares waste output in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that both companies A and B witnessed the downward trend of waste output over 15-year period). In contrast, the amount of was 73
- The line chart above compares waste products in tonnes among 3 companies A, B and C from 2000 to 2005.It can be seen from the graph that company A and B tended to produce less waste than they used to by the beginning. On the other hand, company C’s rate 67
- The bar chart shows information about people’s drinking behavior by age group in the US. Severaltrends areevident.The highest proportion of those who never drink (nearly two-thirds) was in the 16 to 24 yearsgroup. The proportion tended to decrease with 56
- In 1930, 75% of the labour force in the USA was employed in farming, fishing and foresting whileonly 10% worked in sales and office and trade. At the same time both the Industrial sector and thetechnical sector constituted just 2% of the workforce each. T 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while, as for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58857142857 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52465394679 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502857142857 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6504202211 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484870389844 0.215688989381 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293892205018 0.103423049105 284% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.248569479381 0.0843802449381 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.455013110002 0.15604864568 292% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169474794775 0.0819641961636 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.