The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The bar chart and table illustrates the information about total import of fish from United States through China, Canada and others and its entire value between 1998 to 2002 at four and eight years interval.
Overall, it is clearly seen that Canada imported fish 60 % which is overwhelming quantity in 1988 while, china and other imported on 13 % and 27 % respectively. Regarding the table of 1988, total value of fish import was 6.57 Billion Dollars. Although, in 1992, Canada dropped their value 24% but, in the mean time, China and other step up their import and reach 20 % and 46 %. Even though, amount of Dollars also enhances marginally with almost 02 Billion Dollars. Lastly, Canada and others decreased their level off by slightly difference. Whereas, china steeply increased 10 % in 2000, wherein, the value of Dollar raised also more than the last year.
To end, the bar chart demonstrated that the China and other significantly expanded their % howbeit, Canada decreased their level off. And, number of Dollars steadily rose till the end of the year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-03 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 78 | view |
- Some people think that watching sport is wastage of time during leisure time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Today, it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 73
- Should young people follow older people’s example or it’s good for them to challenge older people’s opinions and thoughts. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- We are becoming increasingly depends on computer. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to flyplanes. What things they will be used in the future? Is this dependence on computers are good thing or should we be moresuspicious of th 61
- “Prevention is better than cure”. Out of countries health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and prevention measures. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06285714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47738838419 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645714285714 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8735556901 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4444444444 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246723166342 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100326110737 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115328297592 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170443962558 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11089035443 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.