The given pie charts and table illustrates the value spending in billions of dollars and imported sources of fish to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The most outstanding feature in the given table is that the value of importing fish in between 1988 and 2000 is rapidly increasing. At first, in the year 1988 the cost is 6.57BD and then 8.52BD in 1992. However , the amount value is 10.72BD in 2000.
The most outstanding feature in the given pie charts is that the source of importing fish in canada is declined rapidly , and in china it is contrast in between 1988 and 2000. At first , in 1998 canada imported fish of maximum percentage of 60 which is quite greater than in the given sources and least imported source of fish is china which having 23 percentage and then remaining 27percentage is imported by others. Similarly , in 1992 the percentage of imported fish is 34 percent in canada and with low percent 20 the fish is imported in china , and then quite increase of percentage as compared to 1988 the others having a 40 percent of fish imported. However , in 2000 the percentage of importing fish in canada is drop off to a minimal value of having 28 percent and 30 percent in china , finally the others having an extremity value of 42 percent. To sumup , it seems that percentage of sources of fish imported in between 1988 and 2000 the canada is declined gradually and china is raised slightly.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Princy Paul
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 6.57BD and then 8.52BD in 1992. However , the amount value is 10.72BD in 2000. ...
^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rting fish in canada is declined rapidly , and in china it is contrast in between ...
^^
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...trast in between 1988 and 2000. At first , in 1998 canada imported fish of maximum...
^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of 60 which is quite greater than in the given sources and least imported source ...
^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...centage is imported by others. Similarly , in 1992 the percentage of imported fish...
^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...percent 20 the fish is imported in china , and then quite increase of percentage a...
^^
Line 3, column 666, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g a 40 percent of fish imported. However , in 2000 the percentage of importing fis...
^^
Line 3, column 795, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aving 28 percent and 30 percent in china , finally the others having an extremity ...
^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... extremity value of 42 percent. To sumup , it seems that percentage of sources of ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...radually and china is raised slightly.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1153.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.612 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51024282318 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.372 0.547539520022 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6706417219 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.111111111 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416024582499 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230623710305 0.103423049105 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148283418233 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379218902253 0.15604864568 243% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123414401014 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.