Two pie charts compare various components of household trash in the United Kingdom for the year 1985 and 2000. As an overall assessment,it can be seen that organic household waste had increased in seven years.
As to the graph, there was almost no increase in household trash from the components namely wood and plastic. In contrast, the Britten managed to reduced the household rubbish comming from textiles,glass and metal significantly. It accounted for a drop of nearly 50%. At the same time, they were successful in reducing paper waste from 36% to 16% whereas they failed to do so in kitchen or organic waste. Dust and cinder were also the rubbish contributor which stood at 8% compared to 17% household generated from various sources.
Overall,it is a mixed bag report where the marked reduction in kitchen waste was offset by paper waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... 1985 and 2000. As an overall assessment,it can be seen that organic household wast...
^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , glass
... household rubbish comming from textiles,glass and metal significantly. It accounted f...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sehold generated from various sources. Overall,it is a mixed bag report where t...
^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...erated from various sources. Overall,it is a mixed bag report where the marked ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, as to, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99295774648 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71492345439 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.676056338028 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 210.6 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6402672744 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130510942277 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556917421763 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560088905507 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936323474593 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542752881158 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.