The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart expresses the household rubbish's composition in the years of 1985 and 2002. Overall, it can be clearly seen that, proportion of recycling of kitchen and organic waste remained at highest by the British people. The units are measured in percentage.
in 1984 Britishers were highly activities for recycling process of the waste of kitchen and organic and paper with percentage of 28% and 36% respectively. In addition, this cycling process of the metal and wood waste also contributed to whole composition data which was 8%. While other wastes from dust and cinders, textiles, plastic and glass materials stood below 7% for composition process. on the other side, in the year of 2002, the kitchen and organic waste had contributed almost half of the quarter towards the whole recycling of household rubbish with 44%. the waste from paper and miscellaneous items and also recycled by the British people which was stood at almost second higher proportion 16 % and 17% respectively. brother status like plastics bur textiles and paper answer recycled with least proportion below 7%.
To recapitulate, the wastage of the textile companies were recycled at very low amount in both of the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | Mustafa443 | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- with arise in popularity of the internet newspapers will soon become a thing of the past to what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...he units are measured in percentage. in 1984 Britishers were highly activities ...
^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...stood below 7% for composition process. on the other side, in the year of 2002, th...
^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ecycling of household rubbish with 44%. the waste from paper and miscellaneous item...
^^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Brother
...r proportion 16 % and 17% respectively. brother status like plastics bur textiles and p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
... bur textiles and paper answer recycled with least proportion below 7%. To recapitulate...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15736040609 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71765982623 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1381205771 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0839585862621 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440412044682 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532796121885 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666272972987 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411560295697 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.