The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university

Three pie charts describes about percentage of journals that all students, PHD students and junior lecturers read per week in an Australian university.

Overall, we know that PHD is very difficult to complete and requires a whole new level of hard work. The pie charts confirms, as the amount of books read by PHD candidates is nearly equal to books read by both teachers and all students combined. Although junior lecturers study more than students do so the occupy second place in all three categories.

Most of the students feel like to play games and enjoy their time so the books read by them were really low in numbers only 12 percent read more than 12 books. 21 and 67 are the percentages that students read 1 to 5 and 6 to 11 books respectively. When analyzing about lecturers three fourth are reading 6 to 11 books, in remaining one fourth most read more than 12 books leaving a smaller share of people restrict themselves to read 1 to 5 books.

On the other hand PHD students four fifth of then read more than 12 books and 15 percent students read 6 to 11 books . Only a few people (5 percent) read around 5 books. This shows that among all the groups PHD candidates read a lot, the numbers in the pie chart clearly state this matter.

Votes
Average: 4.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ecturers study more than students do so the occupy second place in all three categories. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d 15 percent students read 6 to 11 books . Only a few people 5 percent read around...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, really, second, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51101321586 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44423807853 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519823788546 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1397558538 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373194970109 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169212328393 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135862062217 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294581390988 0.15604864568 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144358505354 0.0819641961636 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.