The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the average household spending in two different countries in 2010.
It is clear that housing accounted for the largest share of spending in Malaysia while the highest figure in Japan was other goods and survice. Obviously the figues of health care and transport in Japan were double those for Malaysia.
In Malaysia, the proportion of housing was the highest figure with 34% while this figures in Japan only accounted for 21%, over 10% lower than in Malaysia. Other goods and services in Japan was the highest percentage comprised 29% while in in Malaysia was lower with 26%. The number of food outlay in Malaysia was higher than the data that of Japan wasting took up 27% and 24% respectively.
In Japan, the expenditue of health care in both of countries were the lowest figure but the proportion of health care wasting in Japan was higher than the figure that in Malaysia with 6% and 3% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Taytor2609 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Taytor2609 | 100 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | vungochuyen25 | 78 | view |
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 70
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Topic The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 65
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g was the highest figure with 34% while this figures in Japan only accounted for 21%...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... highest percentage comprised 29% while in in Malaysia was lower with 26%. The number...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8125 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46462471788 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4819066947 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142929701543 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855222896041 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528504223639 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113090057036 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590088723887 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.