A glance at the pie chats provided reveals the proportion of expenses spent in different categories (Housing, Transport, Food, Health care, and Other goods and services) in Japan and Malaysia in 2010.
Overall, Malaysians spent more money on Housing than Japanese in the given period. Also, there were three many major expenditures in both country, which were, Housing, Food and Other goods and services. Moreover, the expenses of Health care and Transport in Malaysia were less than the expenditure in Japan.
As it can be seen that, Housing was the major expenditure in Malaysia which accounted for 34% while in Japan housing was 21%. In term of Food, in Malaysia, it was the second major household expenditure and there was 3% more than in Japan, which had 27% and 24% respectively. Similarly, Other goods and services was the only highest expense and were held 26% in Malaysia while in Japan, there was 29%.
On the other hand, remaining parts of expense were Health care and Transport which comprised of 3% and 10%. However, it was doubled in Japan which were 6% and 20% respectively. Furthermore, the least expenditure for both countries was Health Care.
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in different Gulf Countries from 1990 to 2000. 67
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 92
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 69
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: WHICH_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'which comprised' or 'which consisted of' or 'which was composed of'?
Suggestion: which comprised; which consisted of; which was composed of
... expense were Health care and Transport which comprised of 3% and 10%. However, it was doubled in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0206185567 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62194358449 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0140513859 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176368244406 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808793696823 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590270521219 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115250676478 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428965667526 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.