The charts illustrate the average proportion of how much residents in Japan and Malaysia spent on housing, transport, food, health care and other goods and services in 2010.
Overall, health care accounted for the least percentage of the income of inhabitants in both countries. In addition, Japanese used most of their money for other foods and services while the largest figure for Malaysian was spent on housing.
In Japan, people spent 29% of their money on other foods and services, comparing with 26% in Malaysia. However, the proportion of housing in Malaysia was higher than that in Japan, at 34% and 21% respectively. Likewise, standing at 27%, Malaysian's spending on food was also slightly higher than that of Japanese, at 24%.
Expenditures on modes of transportation and accommodation were by far lowest of five items. Specifically, the amount of transport and health care used in Japan was 20% and 6% respectively. However, the figures for Malaysia were even much lower with just half of the numbers in Japan.
- Some people say that in the modern world it is very difficult for people to have a healthy lifestyle Others however say that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both these views and give your opinion Give reasons for y 95
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 11
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world. 61
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries india and China. Write a report to university lecture and describe the data. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...llustrate the average proportion of how much residents in Japan and Malaysia spent o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sport, food, health care and other goods and services in 2010. Overall, health ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83803131919 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565476190476 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0781494582 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152477163397 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664905797268 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644795858696 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102768151 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759226611459 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.