The chart illustrates the proportion of three types of fast food (hamburger, fish and chips, and Pizza) was consumed by income groups in England in the year 1990.
Overall, there were differences in the consumption of three types of fast food eaten by each group. However, people from low-income families consumed the least amount of junk food.
People in high income consumed 42% hamburger, which was higher than 19% and 17% of pizza and fish and chips respectively. Regarding average income citizens, hamburger accounted for nearly one-third diet, which was 7% higher than that of fish and chips. The figure for pizza was by far the lowest, just at 12%.
Fish and Chips provided 16% fast food rations of low-income population. Whereas, The amount of hamburger consumed by this class of people was 14%, which precisely doubled that of pizza.
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both view and give your opinion 88
- The chart gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- Some people say that in the modern world it is very difficult for people to have a healthy lifestyle Others however say that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both these views and give your opinion Give reasons for y 95
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by this class of people was 14%, which precisely doubled that of pizza.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02857142857 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51278364223 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557142857143 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0056147418 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202681633339 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100925072037 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847657943742 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151047962578 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652433104335 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.