The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in country in 1959 and 2010
The pie chart s compares the proportion of feature on six different the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. across the board, it can be seen if housing marked at decrease dramatically percentage was food while the most increased percentage. In 1950 the housing get 72,1% slowly at 2010 has a decrease dramatically until 50,1%. nevertheless the food get great improvement 22,8% in 2010. Even though the education undergo a slight decline nearly 0,3% . Not only education but the health care little development almost 2,1%. Altaugh the transportation have 3,3% first however in 2010 years become growth 10,7%. in 2010 other wise the other also increment oscillate 14,3%. The conclusion average household expenditures in major group is not more significant mostly acquire augment except the housing because in 1995 it have 72,1% Occupy hight percentage and only 22,0% in 2010. While the food hold hight percentage in 2010
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | Jannatul firdausi rahma | 56 | view |
- The line chart below show The percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
- The percentage of male and female teachers in six different tyoes of educational setting in the UK in 2010 61
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this 61
- The chart below shoes the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 61
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Across
...nditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. across the board, it can be seen if housing ma...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...as a decrease dramatically until 50,1%. nevertheless the food get great improvement 22,8% in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 354, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: nevertheless,
...as a decrease dramatically until 50,1%. nevertheless the food get great improvement 22,8% in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ion undergo a slight decline nearly 0,3% . Not only education but the health care ...
^^
Line 1, column 635, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ever in 2010 years become growth 10,7%. in 2010 other wise the other also incremen...
^^
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: OTHER_WISE_OTHERWISE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'otherwise'?
Suggestion: otherwise
...2010 years become growth 10,7%. in 2010 other wise the other also increment oscillate 14,3...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 842, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...t except the housing because in 1995 it have 72,1% Occupy hight percentage and only ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 901, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ight percentage and only 22,0% in 2010. While the food hold hight percentage in 2010 ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79850017501 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5322468832 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24185940341 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895824090311 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127441534381 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24185940341 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.