The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.

The two pie chart give information about the promotions expenses spent in different categories (housing,transport,food,health care, other goods and services)in japan and malaysia in the year 2010.
overall, malaysians spent more money for housing and food compare than japans in this period. Moreover, the expenses of Transport , health care as well as other goods and services in malaysia were less than Japan.

Looking at the charts for more details, Other and goods and servises seem to be the best expenditure in Japan (approxiamently 29%),while in Malaysia it was about 26%.Furthermore Housing show the better position in Malaysia(around 34%)compare than Japan about 21%,in turm of food ,in Malaysia, it was approxiamently 24% similarly japans spent for food about 27%.

On the other side, The least expenditure for both countries was health care,The expense of malaysian for Health and Transport were 3% and 10%.however japans expenditure were doubled which were 6 % and 20% respectively.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transport
...es spent in different categories housing,transport,food,health care, other goods and servi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , health
...ferent categories housing,transport,food,health care, other goods and servicesin japan ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...n japan and malaysia in the year 2010. overall, malaysians spent more money for housin...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iod. Moreover, the expenses of Transport , health care as well as other goods and ...
^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
... 29%,while in Malaysia it was about 26%.Furthermore Housing show the better position in Mal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... 29%,while in Malaysia it was about 26%.Furthermore Housing show the better position in Mal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...are than Japan about 21%,in turm of food ,in Malaysia, it was approxiamently 24% s...
^^
Line 6, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...iture for both countries was health care,The expense of malaysian for Health and Tra...
^^^^
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... malaysian for Health and Transport were 3% and 10%.however japans expenditure we...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, similarly, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53947368421 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52268986754 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.7266951854 43.030603864 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.4 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2 5.23603664747 290% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227677995774 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124962676578 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711726997056 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145450615897 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652649713981 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.