The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The rendered pie charts depicts information about the consumption of coffee, coffee production and the earnings distribution all around the world. The nation under consideration are many and profit distribution are four delivery, retailers, exporters and producers.
At first glance, it can be clearly seen from pie charts Europe registered the highest marks in coffee consumption that was accounted for 41 percent. It was followed by America and rest of the world. Having proportion of 39 percent and 12 percent Japan recorded for lowest that was recorded 8 percent. In production Indonesia surpassed the percentage of Japan and Vietnam but it left behind South Africa that was emerged as 22 percent, 18 percent, 16 percent and 44 percent orderly.
Moving towards further analysis, the highest marks was recorded by delivery in profit distribution and the lowest were exporters that was recorded as 51 percent and 10 percent. Retailer and producers fell in descending order that accounted as 24 percent and 15 percent.
Thus, from an overall analysis it is crystal clear that Europe, South Africa and Delivery were highest in consumption, production and profit distribution as compare to others.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earnings'' or 'earning's'?
Suggestion: earnings'; earning's
...on of coffee, coffee production and the earnings distribution all around the world. The ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at was recorded 8 percent. In production Indonesia surpassed the percentage of Ja...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35978835979 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85352504636 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5356785607 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155925692176 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830443942499 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107225521119 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122450122109 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11070949027 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.