The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

Essay topics:

The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given pie charts depict how much 3 types of electricity was produced in 4 different countries, namely India , Sweden , Morocco and Vietnam from the year 2003 to 2008.
In general, nuclear power was not used for producing electricity in Vietnam and Morocco. It is also noticeable that the use of fossil fuels for energy generation is very common in Vietnam and India but there was opposite pattern in the charts of Sweden and Morocco , fossil fuels made up the smallest proportion during the examined period.
Throughout the years, India occupied the highest position in fossil energy creation, about more than 82%. The second nation manufactured fossil fuels electricity was Vietnam with more than a half of the total amount of generated electricity .By contrast, the percentage of fossil fuels electricity in Sweden and Morocco was extremely low, accounted for only 4% and 5% .
Moreover, hydro power was also relatively popular in all 4 countries, especially Morocco , it was the main materials used for creating electricity with 95% . Meanwhile , this sources was responsible for a quite small proportion in India at 14%. About the nuclear power, it accounted for nearly a half in the use of sources in Sweden , whereas India was smaller with just 4%. Particularly, Vietnam and Morocco did not have any electricity produced by nuclear power.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-05 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given pie charts depict how much 3 types...
^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s depict how much 3 types of electricity was produced in 4 different countries, n...
^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d in 4 different countries, namely India , Sweden , Morocco and Vietnam from the y...
^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fferent countries, namely India , Sweden , Morocco and Vietnam from the year 2003 ...
^^
Line 2, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r was not used for producing electricity in Vietnam and Morocco. It is also notic...
^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tern in the charts of Sweden and Morocco , fossil fuels made up the smallest propo...
^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...il fuels made up the smallest proportion during the examined period. Throughout ...
^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red fossil fuels electricity was Vietnam with more than a half of the total amoun...
^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he total amount of generated electricity .By contrast, the percentage of fossil f...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e total amount of generated electricity .By contrast, the percentage of fossil fu...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...total amount of generated electricity .By contrast, the percentage of fossil fuel...
^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...remely low, accounted for only 4% and 5% . Moreover, hydro power was also relativ...
^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r in all 4 countries, especially Morocco , it was the main materials used for crea...
^^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s used for creating electricity with 95% . Meanwhile , this sources was responsibl...
^^
Line 4, column 167, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...reating electricity with 95% . Meanwhile , this sources was responsible for a quit...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ources was responsible for a quite small proportion in India at 14%. About the nu...
^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y a half in the use of sources in Sweden , whereas India was smaller with just 4%....
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15525114155 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76293294229 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543378995434 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8348328875 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119804187992 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627557763757 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582303860143 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100561390508 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708503024771 0.0819641961636 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.