The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005
The two pie graphs compare the various kind of energy production of France in two different years (1995 and 2005).
Overall, it is clearly shown that for both years, the most significant energy source came from gas and coal. The least among the five energy produced is coming from other energy sources.
In 1995, coal production was almost a third of the total proportion with one percent increase after 10 years. Likewise, gas generated 29.63% which rose marginally to 30.1% after a decade.
With regards to petrol, a decrease of almost one in ten is noticeable from a ratio of 29.27% in 1995 and 19.55% in 2005. In contrast, it is noted that there is an approximately five percent growth in production from both nuclear power and other resources accounting to 10.10% and 9.10 %, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-26 | kamalguri18@@ | view | |
| 2021-10-26 | kamalguri18@@ | view | |
| 2019-06-18 | akva | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | akva | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | akva | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 1995 and 2005 56
- The bar chart below show how frequently the adolescents eat doughnuts in Texas. 73
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 84
- The obesity rate among teenagers has increased dramatically in many developed countries Discuss some possible reasons for this increase and suggestions 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is coming from other energy sources. In 1995, coal production was almost a th...
^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is an approximately five percent growth in production from both nuclear power an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, third, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 666.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 135.0 196.424390244 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.4086580994 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57965657165 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2932987299 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1428571429 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229854695968 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105212345772 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128670607133 0.0843802449381 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15696892039 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147085402668 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.